We cannot manually outwork
machine-speed threats.

Disclosure → weaponization

2.3 years < 24 hours

Zero Day Clock · CSA AI Vulnerability Storm

The AI Vulnerability Storm playbook was written by 70+ CISOs, including the security chiefs of Google, Cloudflare, Atlassian, the NFL, Sophos, and Rivian. They agree on one thing. Weaponization now happens at machine speed, and it's permanent.

The full playbook, free, no form. 29 pages on building a Mythos-ready program.

70+ CISOs ratified what comes next. A selection of contributors who shaped the playbook:

Google Cloudflare Atlassian NFL Sophos Rivian GitLab lululemon TransUnion

Affiliations listed for identification only. Inclusion does not constitute endorsement of Pixee.

What modern defense requires

The Mythos Era demands modern VulnOps.

The AI Vulnerability Storm paper calls for 11 priority actions.

Detection

Find what's exploitable

PA 1Point agents at your code & pipelinesPIXEE PARTIAL
PA 7Inventory & reduce attack surface

Resolution

Fix it at machine speed, with an audit trail

PA 5Prepare for continuous patchingPIXEE OWNS
PA 10Build automated responsePIXEE OWNS
PA 11Stand up VulnOpsPIXEE OWNS
PA 6Update risk models & reportingPIXEE PARTIAL

Foundation

Governance, inventory, segmentation

PA 2Require agentic AI adoption
PA 3Defend your agents
PA 4Innovation governance
PA 8Harden your environment
PA 9Build a deception capability
Pixee owns Partial, via auditable disposition Your platform team

Pixee is how you respond to machine-speed offense

Catch it at design. Fix what ships. Learn from both.

Pixee reduces risk by inserting security into the design and spec process. We then fix any vulnerabilities that still make it through to production.

The Pixee platform as an infinity loop: Proactive Design (Foresight) on the left and Reactive Defense (VulnOps) on the right, converging on one Pixee context graph at the center. Each side feeds the other.

Design on the left, defense on the right, one loop. Constantly improving context creates compounding security.

The proactive prong · before code

The spec is the new attack surface.

The AI is going to write the code. The only question is whether it knows what not to write before it starts.

42%
of committed code is now AI-generated or assisted
SonarSource, State of Code 2026
62%
of new LLM-generated code ships with an exploitable vulnerability
Cycode, AI Era 2026

Foresight is design-stage security, on the same context graph as VulnOps.

STEP 01

Read the design

Ingests your PRDs, design docs, and tickets (Confluence, Notion, Google Docs, Jira, Linear) as they're written.

STEP 02

Extract the promises

Pulls the security promises the design makes, explicit and implicit, and generates the misuse cases teams couldn't write at scale.

STEP 03

Propagate to tickets

Pushes those promises into your tickets (DevRev, Linear, Jira) so engineering sees them at planning, not after launch.

STEP 04

Flag the drift

When a PR lands, compares the code against the design's threat model and flags the drift between what shipped and what was promised.

A real example

A PRD promised user credentials would be hashed with bcrypt and exported PII encrypted at rest. The implementation hashed the credentials with MD5 and wrote the PII in plain text. Foresight caught the drift at PR review. The promise the design made is the contract the implementation has to keep.

Foresight / Customer Data Export Analyzed
68 risk
3 security promises extracted1 misuse case flagged

Promises 2 explicit · 1 implicit

User credentials hashed with bcrypt (cost ≥ 12)EXPLICIT
Exported PII encrypted at restEXPLICIT
Export filenames must not leak record identifiersIMPLICIT
payments-service / PR #312 Promise broken

feat(export): customer data export endpoint

export_service.py · by m.fitzgerald · opened 2h ago

Checked against design promises:

credentials hashed with bcryptPII encrypted at rest
Drift detected · 2 promises broken. Credentials hashed with MD5, not bcrypt. Exported PII written in plain text. Flagged at PR review, before merge.

The reactive prong · after detection

Discovery is what you already do.

Pixee runs the four stages after detection — triage, fix generation, fix validation, PR creation. Our agents understand your code, your conventions, and your history, so you can wipe out vulnerabilities at machine speed.

STAGE 01

Triage

Three layers of exploitability analysis hit every finding before a human does. Up to 95% drop as unreachable, unexposed, or already compensated. Your team only sees what an attacker could actually hit.

Read the Triage Automation Playbook
STAGE 02

Fix Generation

Pixee reads your codebase first — the patterns you follow and the controls you already have in place — then generates a fix that fits. The change that lands looks like your team wrote it.

How Pixee fixes match your conventions
Eval Agent STAGE 03

Fix Validation

The Fix Evaluation Agent is why 76% of Pixee fixes merge as-is. Three gates run before any PR opens: tests, conventions, and regression risk. Every drop, fix, and merge is logged as an auditable disposition.

Why 76% of Pixee fixes merge
STAGE 04

PR Creation

Fixes ship as ordinary pull requests, scoped to the lines they touch, with exploitability context inline. Your team reviews and merges in its normal flow.

How Pixee fits your existing review flow

In production at:

DeltaStream NTT Data Nippon Steel HCL Oracle Olympus MoneyGram Stirling PDF

The difference

A loop that gets smarter in both directions.

One Context Graph powers both halves. Every fix VulnOps ships teaches Foresight what to watch at design time. Every promise Foresight tracks sharpens VulnOps downstream.

The Context Graph

A private, per-customer model of your codebase, scanners, conventions, history, and architecture. Never shared, never used to train shared models. It's why triage reads exploitability right for your deployment, and why fixes look native to your code.

The Pixee Context Graph as four stacked layers: Layer 1 Raw Context (what exists), Layer 2 Process Context (what should happen), Layer 3 Kinetic Context (what's actually exploitable), and Layer 4 Human Feedback Context (what your team trusts).

What you actually get.

Up to
95%
of findings dropped before they reach your queue

Three layers of exploitability triage filter out what isn't reachable, exposed, or actually exploitable.

Merge rate
76%
of Pixee fixes merge as-is, no edits

Industry baselines for unsupervised AI fix merge sit in the 30–40% range. Both numbers are published and audited.*

Full coverage across SAST and SCA

Pixee unifies findings from 12 native scanners — CodeQL, Snyk (SAST + SCA), Semgrep, Checkmarx, Veracode, SonarQube, GitLab SAST, HCL AppScan, Synopsys Polaris, Aqua Trivy, DefectDojo, Datadog SAST. Anything else lands via universal SARIF v2.1.0. One view across first-party code, dependencies, and containers.

A system of record for why

Every triage drop, fix regenerate, fix exit, and PR merge is written as an auditable disposition with its rationale. When an auditor or board asks "what did we do, and why?", the answer is already written, across your whole surface.

Two terms worth defining.

Pixee defines

VulnOps

The operating function that runs every step between detection and merge — triage, fix, validation, PR — at machine speed, with every decision logged. It's the Resolution layer of the CSA playbook (PA 11), and Pixee's reactive prong.

Pixee defines

Agentic Security Engineering

The category for security software that acts on findings instead of just alerting on them. Detection tells you what's wrong; Agentic Security Engineering does something about it.

Common questions.

The next step

See Pixee on your stack.

A live walkthrough with real examples from production deployments.

We map Pixee to your scanners and SCM, so the integration is clear up front.

You leave with the sizing math and a concrete integration plan.