As featured on Unsupervised Learning with Daniel Miessler

Your Scanners Found the Vulnerabilities.
We Fix Them.

Pixee is the agentic security engineering platform your stack has been missing. We integrate across the SDLC to eliminate false positives, trace real exploitability, and auto-fix true vulnerabilities. Enterprise compliant, context-aware, and scanner agnostic.

Trusted by security teams at regulated enterprises

76%
Developer merge rate
95%
False positives eliminated
10+
Integrations across the SDLC

Pixee Platform Data, 2025 — across 10,000+ repositories

Your scanners found 100,000 vulnerabilities. Now what?

Companies average 100,000+ findings in backlog, take weeks to remediate issues, and spend all of their time on triage. The issue is that nothing has reliably turned findings into fixes at scale.

The rise of AI coding agents has made the problem worse. More code, more dependencies, more vulnerabilities, faster speed. Traditional AppSec wasn’t built for this world. Pixee is.

Pixee’s Security Engineer — across your entire SDLC

AI coding assistants changed development. Now security needs to change too. Pixee deploys specialized agents across the SDLC, connected by a shared context graph. Two capabilities are production-proven today. Three more are in development.

1

Design Analysis

Agents review architecture and requirements for security implications before code is written. Threat surfaces, auth gaps, and data flow risks caught at design.

2

Code Review

Security-focused AI participates in pull requests, learns your team’s patterns, and provides specific guidance, not just flags.

3
Core — Production

Triage + Fix

The resolution engine. Exploitability analysis separates real findings from noise by proving what’s actually exploitable in your environment, not just reachable. For real findings, fixes match your conventions, libraries, and validation patterns. Connect your scanner, see fixes in hours, watch developers merge them.

4
Core — Production

Campaign Remediation

Backlog reduction in organized campaigns. Instead of drowning in 100,000 findings, run targeted campaigns (“eliminate all critical SQLi this quarter”) with fixes prioritized by risk. Progress tracking built in. 100+ fixes merged in week one is typical.

5

Incident Response

When the next critical CVE drops, assess blast radius across your entire estate and push fixes to every affected repository. Response time from weeks to hours.

Context Graph

All agents share a context graph that learns your conventions, policies, and risk tolerance. Every triage decision and every merged fix feeds back in. Month 1 is good. Month 6 is measurably better.

Triage Automation

95% fewer false positives — with evidence, not scores

Your scanners flag thousands of findings. Most aren’t exploitable in your environment. Pixee’s exploitability analysis evaluates security controls, auth boundaries, and deployment context, not just reachability. 2,000 alerts become 50 real findings, each with evidence.

“This code path is behind 3 auth layers, only reachable via localhost. Not exploitable.” That’s the output — a technical proof, not a risk score. Your team stops triaging noise and starts fixing what’s real.

95% false positive reduction | 74% less manual triage time
Context-Aware Remediation

Fixes that match your code. 76% merge rate.

Generic AI says “use parameterized queries.” Pixee says “use your existing SafeQueryBuilder class on line 47 that handles your DB-specific escaping patterns.”

That difference — knowing your libraries, your patterns, your validation logic — is why developers merge Pixee fixes at 76% and reject generic patches 80% of the time. Pixee handles the research and first draft. Your developers make the final call.

91% remediation time reduction | 76% merge rate vs <20% generic AI
Scanner-Agnostic Integration

Works with your existing 5.3 tools

Pixee integrates with Snyk, Checkmarx, Veracode, Fortify, SonarQube, Semgrep, CodeQL, and more. Every major SCM: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps. Self-hosted, cloud, or air-gapped. Bring your own model with Azure OpenAI.

Your existing scanner investment becomes more valuable, not redundant. Scanners find. Pixee fixes. No vendor lock-in. No rip-and-replace.

10+ scanner integrations | All major SCMs | Self-hosted + air-gapped
“We connected our Checkmarx instance on Monday. By Friday, developers had merged 47 fixes without a single escalation to our security team. That backlog had been sitting there for two years.”
Head of Application Security Fortune 500 Financial Services

Everyone has AI. Context is what matters.

Every security vendor says “AI-powered.” The difference is what the AI knows about your code.

Pixee’s context graph builds a deep model of your codebase:

  • Your security policies and coding conventions
  • Your validation libraries and architectural patterns
  • Which fixes your developers accept and why they reject others

Generic AI treats every codebase the same. The context graph treats yours as yours.

We don’t trust our own AI either. An independent evaluation agent rejects 20-30% of generated fixes before developers see them. Then every surviving fix goes through your normal code review and CI/CD. Three layers of validation before anything merges.

We reject 20-30% of our own AI’s fixes before you see them. We trust the process, not the model.

A pipeline with opinions — not a wrapper.

Turn Your 100,000-Finding Backlog Into a Burndown Plan

Your 100,000-finding backlog isn’t permanent. This playbook shows how to go from overwhelming vulnerability debt to measurable burndown: exploitability analysis to cut the noise, campaign-based remediation to fix what’s left.

  • The methodology behind exploitability analysis
  • How to structure campaign-based remediation
  • Board-ready metrics that prove burndown progress
  • Real-world timeline: 100k findings to measurable reduction

12-page playbook · PDF · No fluff

Ready to see it on your code?

Connect your scanner and repo in minutes. First fixes generated within 72 hours. Pick your hardest repo — the one with the noisiest scanner output and the most stubborn backlog. The diff is more convincing than anything on this page.

Request a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

Copilot is designed for code generation, not security remediation. It works only with CodeQL findings and produces generic patches that require multiple iterations. In enterprise deployments, security teams report seven iterations before a Copilot fix is production-ready. Pixee is purpose-built for security: 76% merge rate on the first try, 10+ scanner integrations, and enterprise deployment options including self-hosted and air-gapped.

76% of them do. That number isn’t a benchmark we set. It’s developers voting with the merge button. If a fix doesn’t match their coding conventions, uses the wrong library, or introduces regression risk, they reject it. Pixee’s context-aware approach matches your codebase patterns, which is why the merge rate is 4x higher than generic AI alternatives.

No. Pixee is scanner-agnostic and integrates with 10+ tools including Snyk, Checkmarx, Veracode, Fortify, SonarQube, Semgrep, and CodeQL. Teams typically connect their first scanner in under an hour. You keep the tools you have. Pixee adds the resolution platform they’re missing.

An AI wrapper looks at a CVE and suggests a generic fix. Pixee’s context graph knows your security policies, coding conventions, and validation libraries. An independent evaluation agent rejects 20-30% of generated fixes before developers see them. Then your normal code review and CI/CD. Three layers of validation, not one layer of suggestion.

No. It replaces toil. At a 1:35 ratio with developers, your security team can’t manually triage and fix a growing backlog. Pixee automates the repetitive 80% (triage, fix generation, verification) so your team focuses on secure design reviews, threat modeling, and security architecture.

Yes. Pixee supports self-hosted and fully air-gapped deployment with BYOM (bring your own model) via Azure OpenAI. About half of our enterprise deployments are self-hosted. All major SCMs are supported: GitHub Enterprise, GitLab, Bitbucket Data Center, and Azure DevOps.

Reachability checks whether a code path can be reached. Exploitability evaluates three dimensions: defensive controls (auth layers, input validation), deployment context (network topology, access boundaries), and business logic. The output is evidence, not a score: “this code path is behind 3 auth layers, only accessible via localhost, not exploitable.” That depth is why it eliminates far more false positives than reachability-only approaches.

Security
SOC 2 Type II
Compliance
ISO 27001